|
| AUTHOR |
MESSAGE |
|
perveman
111 / male
Tucson, Arizona, US
|
Just triva
If you take the last two digits of your birth year, add the age you are on your birthday this year, and the total is, 111. Example: If you were born in 66, on your birthday this year you will be, or were, 45, equals, 111. Works for all, except for those 100, and over. I checked that out with George Burns, and Bob Hope. Wierd huh? 
|
| May 22, 2011, 12:28 |
|
User no longer registered.
|
Re: Just triva
Totally weird! I did look it up on a math site for the whole algebra explanation.
|
| May 23, 2011, 12:35 |
|
wandering5tar
53 / male
London, England, UK
|
Re: Just triva
If you think more clearly about this you are saying:
Take the year you were born (e.g. 1970).
Add your age this year (e.g. 41).
The result is this year (e.g. 2011)
This is basically the definition of "age"!
The loss of the century part of the dates makes it appear "mysterious" and also explains why it doesn't work for anyone over 100!
|
| May 23, 2011, 12:56 |
|
perveman
111 / male
Tucson, Arizona, US
|
Re: Re: Just triva
QUOTE (Chazzy @ May 23, 2011, 12:35)Totally weird! I did look it up on a math site for the whole algebra explanation.
Don't know about algebra, but after I heard it, ran a bunch of bdays:d, age's, found it true. 
|
| May 23, 2011, 13:15 |
|
perveman
111 / male
Tucson, Arizona, US
|
Re: Re: Just triva
QUOTE (wandering5tar @ May 23, 2011, 12:56)If you think more clearly about this you are saying:
Take the year you were born (e.g. 1970).
Add your age this year (e.g. 41).
The result is this year (e.g. 2011)
This is basically the definition of "age"!
The loss of the century part of the dates makes it appear "mysterious" and also explains why it doesn't work for anyone over 100!
Respectfully, last 2 digits in the year is 70, plus age on b-dax this year, 41, is 111. Interesting though, 2011, will do more research.
|
| May 23, 2011, 13:26 |
|
perveman
111 / male
Tucson, Arizona, US
|
Re: Re: Just triva
QUOTE (wandering5tar @ May 23, 2011, 12:56)If you think more clearly about this you are saying:
Take the year you were born (e.g. 1970).
Add your age this year (e.g. 41).
The result is this year (e.g. 2011)
This is basically the definition of "age"!
The loss of the century part of the dates makes it appear "mysterious" and also explains why it doesn't work for anyone over 100!
Right you are! Works that way too. Now just have to put this to practible use, huh? 
|
| May 23, 2011, 13:48 |
|
|
